🔗 Share this article

Internal papers show that government officials implemented a ban on Palestine Action notwithstanding receiving advice that such action could “unintentionally boost” the group’s profile, according to newly obtained official briefings.

The Situation

This advisory document was drafted 90 days ahead of the formal banning of the organization, which was established to conduct protests designed to halt UK arms supplies to Israel.

The document was written three months ago by personnel at the interior ministry and the local governance ministry, aided by counter-terrorism advisers.

Opinion Polling

Following the title “What would be the banning of the network be viewed by British people”, a segment of the report warned that a proscription could become a controversial topic.

Officials portrayed Palestine Action as a “small focused movement with lower general news exposure” relative to comparable protest movements including Just Stop Oil. Yet it highlighted that the organisation’s activities, and apprehensions of its supporters, received publicity.

Experts stated that surveys indicated “growing dissatisfaction with IDF tactics in Gaza”.

Leading up to its central thesis, the report cited a poll showing that a majority of Britons believed Israel had exceeded limits in the hostilities in Gaza and that a like percentage backed a ban on arms shipments.

“These represent viewpoints upon which Palestine Action group builds its profile, campaigning directly to oppose the nation’s weapons trade in the UK,” the document stated.

“If that the group is outlawed, their profile may unintentionally be boosted, gaining backing among similarly minded individuals who reject the British footprint in the Israel’s weapons trade.”

Other Risks

Officials noted that the public were against appeals from the conservative press for tough action, including a proscription.

Further segments of the briefing referenced research saying the population had a “widespread unfamiliarity” about the group.

The document said that “much of the British public are probably at this time unaware of Palestine Action and would remain so should there be a ban or, upon being told, would stay mostly indifferent”.

This proscription under anti-terror legislation has resulted in rallies where numerous people have been detained for carrying banners in open spaces declaring “I oppose genocide, I stand with the network”.

The report, which was a social effects evaluation, stated that a proscription under anti-terror statutes could escalate Muslim-Jewish strains and be seen as state bias in support of Israel.

The briefing alerted ministers and top advisers that outlawing could become “a catalyst for major debate and censure”.

Aftermath

One leader of the group, stated that the report’s warnings had materialized: “Awareness of the concerns and popularity of the group have surged significantly. This proscription has been counterproductive.”

The home secretary at the period, the minister, revealed the proscription in June, shortly following the network’s supporters allegedly vandalized property at RAF Brize Norton in the county. Authorities claimed the destruction was significant.

The timing of the document shows the outlawing was under consideration long prior to it was made public.

Policymakers were advised that a ban might be perceived as an undermining of individual rights, with the advisers saying that certain people in government as well as the general citizenry may consider the measure as “a gradual extension of terrorism powers into the domain of speech rights and activism.”

Government Statements

A departmental spokesperson stated: “Palestine Action has conducted an escalating campaign entailing criminal damage to the nation’s critical defense sites, coercion, and claimed attacks. These actions places the protection of the public at risk.

“Rulings on proscription are carefully considered. These are guided by a robust evidence-based process, with input from a wide range of specialists from multiple agencies, the authorities and the Security Service.”

A counter-terrorism official said: “Rulings regarding outlawing are a responsibility for the government.

“Naturally, anti-terror units, together with a range of other agencies, routinely supply information to the Home Office to support their work.”

The report also revealed that the executive branch had been financing monthly surveys of social friction connected to Israel and Palestine.